<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pork on Edaku</title><link>https://edaku.ru/en/tags/pork/</link><description>Recent content in Pork on Edaku</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>Edaku</managingEditor><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:00:00 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://edaku.ru/en/tags/pork/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Beef and Pork Macros Compared</title><link>https://edaku.ru/en/articles/2026-06-15-beef-and-pork-macros-compared/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><author>Edaku</author><guid>https://edaku.ru/en/articles/2026-06-15-beef-and-pork-macros-compared/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Beef and pork get compared constantly, as if each were a single uniform product with one fixed calorie count, but the truth is that the macros of both meats swing enormously depending on the specific cut. A lean tenderloin and a fatty belly cut from the very same animal can differ in calories by two to three times, which makes comparing &amp;ldquo;beef&amp;rdquo; to &amp;ldquo;pork&amp;rdquo; in the abstract not especially useful — the cut matters far more than the species.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>